Showing posts with label Massachusetts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Massachusetts. Show all posts

Thursday, January 21, 2010

The Democrats Start to Fracture

AmericanThinker.com
By J. Robert Smith
January 21, 2010

In the coming weeks and months, the best political spectator sport around might not be Democrats versus Republicans or conservatives versus liberals, but Democrats of all stripes turning on one another.

Other than demagoguery, what Democrats are most accomplished at is fratricide (think back to the '60s and '70s). In the wake of Scott Brown's hosing of Martha Coakley, the Democrats are about to have a good old-fashioned civil war. Pity for them; bully for America.

The Democrats are dividing roughly along these lines: left ideologues against pols, the latter being those congressional Democrats who like their jobs and don't intend to wrap themselves in the European Union flag and jump off a craggy cliff into the Potomac.

It's Pelosi and Frank and their ilk versus Heath Shuler and his ilk. But given Tuesday night's win for Scott Brown in deep blue Massachusetts, it may be more than self-styled Democratic moderates who choose to defect. A few liberals may join in, too.

President Obama is showing every sign of being a cliff-jumper. Word out of the White House is that he plans to go on a populist offensive. In other words, he aims to demagogue anyone and anything in an attempt to divert voters' attention from his utterly woeful, ideologically blind performance to date. And did I mention that under the cover of a hate, resentment, and envy campaign, Mr. Obama and his chief congressional lieutenants, the envenomed Nancy Pelosi and the passive-aggressive Harry Reid, will still scheme to foist statism on America?

While the President's bravado may warm the hearts of Huffington Post and Daily Kos denizens, and while he may win plaudits from the Davids (Broder, Gergen, and Brooks) and the New York Times (among other liberal mouthpieces) for his supposed shrewdness, plenty of work-a-day congressional Democrats aren't going to enlist in a lemmings' march into the sea.

Self-preservation is a powerful instinct. The Coakley upending is the fork in the road for Democrats who are more enamored of themselves than stinky left-wing orthodoxy. The marker at the road's fork points right, toward the middle ground. It's where these Democrats know they must go if they are to stand a prayer of retaining their seats in November.

With every passing day, expect a few, and then lots of sobered Democrats to take the road right, regardless of the sharp disapproval of Pelosi and Reid or the threats of the White House Capone crew.

Congressional members peeling away from their party's failing president is nothing new in Washington annals. LBJ and Richard Nixon could have given you earfuls.

But left-wing activists and fundraisers and money-givers aren't going to take defections lightly. While keeping guns trained on Mr. Obama to ensure his fealty, expect left-wingers to turn other guns on congressional Democrats cheeky enough to scuttle ideology in favor of survival.

Nowadays, the left isn't so much a movement as it is a death pact. If you've taken its money or accepted its campaign ground troops or benefited from its uncoordinated expenditures -- and most Democrats have -- then you're on the hook. It's like the mafia: Once you're made, you can't be unmade. Woe to the good fella or gal who wishes to part company.

Don't expect defecting Democrats to go gentle into the night. When the left opens fire on them, expect them to fire back. It's to their advantage. Positioning will be critical at this point on to the defectors. They'll need to demonstrate to voters that they've separated themselves from the dead weight that are Obama's health care legislation and his cap-and-tax and immigration reform aims (only liberals can turn "reform" into a dirty word).

This Democratic civil war means that the president's health care reform legislation is as dead as the Articles of Confederation. Cap-and-tax proposals based on specious climate change arguments and economy-killing provisions are already floundering, and they will go the way of the dinosaur if the president, Pelosi, and Reid push them harder. Immigration reform is a sticky-wicket. Attempting to liberalize immigration laws at a time when the economy is hurting and unemployment hovers around ten percent isn't the swiftest move.

Watch to see what higher-profile Democratic senators like Evan Bayh and Blanche Lincoln do. Throw Jim Webb in the mix as well. Unlike the wretched Ben Nelson or the oily Mary Landrieu, who have so conspicuously sold their souls to Mr. Obama and the left, the aforementioned senators have a limited opportunity to act to rehabilitate themselves by jumping off the Obama train to nowhere. If these senators are as self-serving as I suspect them to be, that's three votes that Mr. Obama and Majority Leader Reid can't count on. And more names can be added to the list.

If the Democrats' civil war plays out as expected, the result will be legislative torpor, magnificent wheels-squealing, and grinding-to-a-halt gridlock for 2010. Much to the relief of taxpayers and Main Street Americans, the 111th Congress will do no more damage...because it can't.

Civil wars typically don't have pretty endings. This one won't, either. A bad economy made worse by a "waste no crisis" president and his henchmen and a War on Terror that's devolving into an ACLU parody combined with a fracturing and fighting Democratic Party is the stuff of electoral bloodbaths, perhaps eclipsing the Democrats' 1994 carnage.

But that's for another day. Right now, let's just thank conservatives, tea party patriots, and independents (and some rank-and-file Democrats) for Scott Brown's victory. Bay Staters, along with their brethren earlier in Virginia and New Jersey, have a made a stout first line of defense against Mr. Obama's and the left's encroachment on our liberties.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Saying No to Emperor Obama

Obama’s narcissism and arrogance will blind him to the message of the Massachusetts victory.Canada Free Press.com

By Alan Caruba Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Yes, it’s true. The emperor has no clothes. Even in a State where you cannot swing a dead cat without hitting a dozen Democrats, the voters said “No.”

“We don’t want your odious Medicare ‘reform’. We don’t want to be forced to buy insurance. We don’t want a bill that exists only because every sweetheart deal and other form of bribery was used to get it to this point in the Senate.” And, ignored by the media, it was no to amnesty for illegal aliens as well, another issue of Scott Brown’s race.

The significance of the Massachusetts victory for Scott Brown is the repudiation of Barack Hussein Obama, his policies, and his performance in office.

It wasn’t the first time the voters sent the White House this message. They told him to buzz off in Virginia and they told him to get lost in New Jersey. This is a tangible voter backlash against profligate spending and excessive taxation.

Come November, the voters, Democrats, Republicans, and independents will come together to clean house in Washington, D.C. It takes no great punditry to see that coming. If the midterms were held tomorrow, the result would be the same.

It is almost beyond comprehension how Obama could have engineered a failed presidency within the space of just one year. He got a lot of help from Speaker Nancy Pelosi, as mendacious and imperious an individual to have ever held that office. He got a lot of help from Majority Leader Harry Reid, a scowling, malicious cockroach whom the voters of Nevada will remove in November.

Obama’s narcissism and arrogance will blind him to the message of the Massachusetts victory. He and his press secretary, Robert “Glib” Gibbs, will put out a statement that will dismiss the historic event as just an aberration, but the aberration is Obama!

So, stand up and take a bow, Massachusetts!

Home to the Pilgrims;
home to the Boston massacre when British troops fired on protesters in 1770;
home to the 1773 tea party to protest taxes; and
birthplace of Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Sam Adams, Elbridge Gerry, Josiah Bartlett, Roger Sherman, and John Hancock, signers of the Declaration of Independence!

Those first Americans led the resistance to the greatest power of their day, Great Britain, and its king.

For all the years Obama taught the U.S. Constitution at the University of Chicago Law School, he either never really understood it or never believed it means what it says.

He never understood that real Americans will not be pushed around, cheated of their Constitutional birthright, or be lied to.

They will push back.

A former emperor, Napoleon of France, spent his last days as an exile on St. Helena. It would not surprise me if Emperor Obama spends his on one of Hawaii’s islands.


Alan has a daily blog called Warning Signs. His latest book is Right Answers: Separating Fact from Fantasy.

Alan can be reached at acaruba@aol.com
Older articles by Alan Caruba

Brown - Paul Revere's Ride!


Congratulations, Senator...
and God Bless America!!!

You might like to add this site to your favorites: Reaganite Republican.com

http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Scott Brown wins Massachusetts Senate special election race

State Sen. Scott Brown won a remarkable upset victory over state Attorney General Martha Coakley (D) tonight in a Massachusetts Senate special election, a victory likely to spawn broad-ranging political and policy consequences heading into the midterm elections.

With 71 percent of precincts reporting, Brown held a 53 percent to 46 percent lead over Coakley. Coakley called Brown to concede the race moments ago, according to a Democratic aide.

Brown's victory is the first for Republicans at the Senate level for Republican in Massachusetts since 1972 and he becomes the lone GOPer in the 12-person federal delegation from the Bay State.

While it is a historic win within Massachusetts, the implications of Brown's victory for the national political scene are even more critical.

Brown will give Republicans a 41st seat in the Senate, robbing Democrats of the filibuster-proof majority the party had used to pass President Obama's health care plan late last year. In the immediate lead-up to tonight's vote, Democrats -- including the White House and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) -- insisted that the party would move forward on health care but it is unclear whether that bravado will carry over in the coming days as the party seeks to deal with Coakley's stunning upset.

"I have no interest in sugar coating what happened in Massachusetts," said Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chairman Bob Menendez (N.J.). "There is a lot of anxiety in the country right now. Americans are understandably impatient."

Congressional strategists had warned in the closing days of the Massachusetts Senate race that a Coakley defeat had the potential to trigger a series of retirements within the Democratic ranks as members flee a political wave that could wash out dozens in the House and high single digits on the Senate side.

"My message to my clients? Jump ship now," said one Democratic operative who advises a number of targeted Members of Congress. "Obama can't help you."

Democratic leaders spent much of Tuesday reaching out to vulnerable Members to convince them that the circumstances that led to Coakley's demise were unique to her and the state and not indicative of the general political environment in which they will have to run in November.

Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Chris Van Hollen (Md.) sought to downplay the Massachusetts result in a statement released after Coakley had conceded the contest. "House Democrats have been preparing since day one last year for what we knew historically would be a very challenging election cycle," said Van Hollen.

It's not clear whether these efforts will pay off as Democratic Members of Congress were already fearful of what is coming in 2010 -- particularly after five retirements and a party switch over the past two months in competitive districts around the country.

The high stakes for Democrats were apparent in the final week of the campaign as the national party poured resources and manpower into Massachusetts in hopes of saving what was clearly a flagging campaign.

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee spent nearly $1.5 million on ads in support of Brown and President Obama made a hastily-scheduled visit to the state on Sunday -- his wife's birthday -- in hopes of energizing a lethargic party base.

As Tuesday wore on, and it became clear that Coakley was likely to come up short, the finger pointing within the Democratic party began in earnest with the candidate's advisers insisting that they had not received nearly enough support in the past month from national Democrats and DC-based strategists alleging that the blame for the loss lie entirely on Coakley.

"The campaign failed to recognize this threat, failed to keep Coakley on the campaign trail, failed to create a negative narrative about Brown [and] failed to stay on the air in December while he was running a brilliant campaign," said one Democratic party official, adding that it is "wishful thinking" from Coakley to blame the national party for "one of the worst debacle in American political history".

Republicans, meanwhile, were gleeful -- touting the Massachusetts victory on top of wins in gubernatorial races in Virginia and New Jersey in 2009 as evidence that the political pendulum was swinging quickly in their direction.

"Democrats will try to play this race off as an isolated incident, but the recent spate of polling in swing districts across the country proves that Massachusetts isn't the exception of the 2010 election cycle, its the rule," said National Republican Congressional Committee communications director Ken Spain. "Any Democrat who voted for the health care bill now knows how big of an albatross they will have hanging around their necks."

By Chris Cillizza | January 19, 2010; 9:19 PM ET

Massachusetts - Jan.19,2010 - David vs. Goliath

Atlas Shrugs.com


Note: This is the day America speaks out! May it be a day of rejoicing! Let this day be known as Boston's "second" Tea Party and let the cry be heard throughout the land! BeeSting

Monday, January 18, 2010

God Bless Massachusetts

Canada Free Press
By Mike Konkel Monday, January 18, 2010


It Is a Freedom Thing

One can hardly think of Massachusetts without thinking about Kennedy….all of them
. When I was growing up in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and was a junior in high school, John Kennedy got assassinated. I was a ward of the county since my 7th or 8th year, dysfunctional family and all, and in November, 1963 I was residing at Perpetual Help Boy’s Home, a place when we weren’t doing homework, we were polishing the linoleum floors with cinder blocks on top of army blanket pieces.

I wrote a poem at that time and sent it in to some writer’s magazine:

He traveled through the town spreading faith and good cheer
remembering what happened doth bring forth a tear,
to the eyes of the old and to the eyes of the young,
over a President, now sung…

A man of valor, of courage and kindness,
who hath fired that shot, hath fired in blindness.

I don’t know if it ever got past the person’s garbage can who opened the envelope but the point is Kennedy was a democrat and back then, they were just all right with me.

Six weeks later, 19 days after my 17th birthday, I was on my way to Marine boot camp and one year and six weeks later I was fighting in Vietnam, the war John Kennedy thought was important to win…important to beat communism.

I went to Vietnam twice, Marines did 13 month tours and mine spanned mid-65 to mid-66 and then a year in language school, back in mid-68 to mid-69 and had friends from that “Dirty Water” state. I spent 9 years total in the Corps and distinctly remember this boot corporal from Boston, when I was between tours and stationed at Camp Elmore (Norfolk, Va)(FMFLant), one in particular used to zoom around in a little TR3 with the radio blaring especially when he cranked up that ‘Dirty Water’ song. We were buds.

I didn’t change much….spent many years really apathetic after we quit Vietnam and I doubt if my fellow Marines from Boston or Texas or wherever, really changed that much. Once the democratic party was a proud party…they had good intentions. I loved John Kennedy and Bobby. I loved Bobby’s passion and maybe I was just young but I knew instinctively that when me, other poor white trash like me along with my bro’s from the hood were the only ones in Vietnam….something was going on.

The democratic party and America are now watching, almost idly, as progressives make a giant raid on our Republic…oh please, let us throw in the elitist republicans like Richard Lugar (I live in Indiana now) who factored hugely in the acceptance of President Ubama’s czardom.

Massachusetts is simply joining the rest of America in awakening to the evils under the dome in DC. And all at once I am proud of the people that produced Bobby and John Kennedy…Patrick, this is a school day, go to bed early tonight. I do hope Martha Coakley doesn’t get anywhere near Kabul, Afghanistan….even though I hear there aren’t any terrorists there anymore….moved to Pakistan and Yemen you know. Hey, Martha, some actually did move to New York City you know.

It is difficult on an individual level or on a corporate level to turn back to true north after making so many damn wrong turn in one’s life, and often not much fun in doing so. But when you don’t know how to get back to where you started, when it looks gummed up left and right…there is always up. Prodigal sons and daughters eventually, look up.

Massachusetts is looking up and looking good. This is not about party, this is about the American Republic and we all know it.

Semper Fi,

Michael R. Konkel
Sg, USMC


Mike Konkel, Married, an empty nester, former Marine and Vietnam war veteran. Retired manufacturing manager and I have recently shaken off my political apathy. Mike can be reached at: MikeK369@msn.com

Brown Victory Would Signal Second American Revolution


Canada Free Press
By Joan Swirsky Monday, January 18, 2010

A definitive referendum against all things Obama

When Scott Brown gallops to victory tomorrow, capturing the Massachusetts senate seat made absent by Sen. Ted Kennedy’s death, it will signal a definitive referendum against all things Obama – his onerous and discriminatory “healthcare” bill (which an overwhelming majority of Americans fear and loathe), his failing economy, his escalating unemployment rate, his out-of-control spending, his accumulating federal debt, and, in far broader terms, his socialist-cum-communist regime, including those self-described Marxists and Maoists czars who are trying to whiplash our country into Castro territory.

How did this happen? It happened because America is a good and great country. Our electorate – approximately 43 percent of the over-300-million people who bask every day in America’s largesse – saw a nice young black man campaign for the presidency in 2008 and gave him a chance in spite of serious doubts about his lifelong radical associations with anti-American, anti-white, and anti-Semitic friends, colleagues, political associates and his church, not to mention his embarrassing lack of experience and also the grave questions about his Constitutional eligibility to become president. For liberals it expiated the white guilt of slavery; for conservatives it was yet another example of America’s historical exceptionalism.

But it didn’t take long for the cold harsh reality of this nice young man’s radical agenda to set in and for Americans of every political stripe to recoil at:

  • His irresistible compulsion to bow and scrape to foreign despots
  • His serial apologies on foreign soil for big bad America’s sins
  • His reflexively siding with racists like Harvard professor Skip Gates and the ACORN thugs
  • His egregious flouting of the U.S. Constitution vis-à-vis the nearly-40 czars he has appointed to run our country, many of them admitted Communists and
  • Maoists with extreme and frightening viewpoints. In fact, Laura Hollis writes quite persuasively, they are all Communists.
  • His intrusive and damaging meddling in our banking, automotive, energy, and healthcare industries
  • His doling out billions of dollars to foreign nations without Congressional approval
  • His destructive manipulation of free markets
  • His attempts to control the media and curb free speech, take away gun rights, and give our hard-earned tax dollars to terrorist nations


Joan Swirsky Most recent columns

Joan Swirsky is an award winning author and journalist. Her work can be found at joanswirsky.com

Joan can be reached at JoanSharon@aol.com

Lawyering up Kirk seat a legal target (Massachusetts Brown)

There is speculation that Sen. Paul Kirk (above) will lose
his vote in the Senate after the special election AP



By POLITICO STAFF | 01/18/10 9:06 AM


POLITICO Pulse reports on the possible legal fallout from Tuesday's special election in Massachusetts:

A victory by Republican Scott Brown tomorrow in Massachusetts could quickly turn into a legal battle over the man he would replace -- with the future of health reform in the Senate hanging in the balance. The Weekly Standard's Fred Barnes is arguing that Sen. Paul Kirk will lose his vote in the Senate after the special election, no matter who wins, signaling a possible GOP line of attack against health reform if it passes with Kirk's vote. GOP elected officials haven't embraced that argument, and two academic election law experts contacted by POLITICO rebutted the notion that Kirk will no longer be a senator after the election.

But it's a sign of the fierce legal and political battles likely to ensue if Brown upsets Democrat Martha Coakley in the race to fill the late Sen. Ted Kennedy's Senate seat. And Kirk would be in the middle of it all. Brown would take over for Kirk, a supporter of reform, and become the 41st vote against the health bill - ending the Democrats' filibuster-proof majority and throwing reform's future into serious doubt. Republicans are worried that if Brown wins, Democrats will try to jam through a Senate health reform vote while Kirk still occupies the seat, in the time between Brown's election and when he is certified the winner. Kirk has pledged to vote for reform for as long as he remains a senator, even if Brown wins.

Every vote matters - Obama-Coakley - new ad

Politico.com

WATCH: President Barack Obama appears in a new ad for Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley's Senate campaign, as the Democrat struggles to regain her lead a day before the election.

Dems try to tar Brown as Birther, thinly (Massachusetts election)

The DSCC is making hay this morning of this clip in which Scott Brown, in the process of praising President Obama's mother for deciding to have him at age 18, expresses some doubt -- and chuckles uncomfortably -- over the question of whether his parents were married when he was born.



DSCC spokesman Eric Schultz called the video "appalling" and tried to link Brown to the Birther movement, which denies Obama's citizenship and claims he was born abroad -- things he didn't even hint at in the video.

"Now, we find out that similar to the fringe birthers movement, he’s raised questions about President Barack Obama’s birth. Despite his best attempts to mask who he is, Scott Brown is an extremist who does not represent Massachusetts values, and he owes voters an explanation today on what he meant in this interview," Schultz said.

The claim is a wild stretch. The fact that Obama's mother was young and had to marry on the fly (his mother was pregnant when they were married in Feburary, 1981) is central to his biography, as is his father's absence, and while Brown seems confused on that biographical point, he doesn't suggest in any way that he's aligned with the Birthers. Indeed in a GOP where Birther claims are common on the Hill and on the airwaves, Brown's words are practically a vote of confidence.

UPDATE: Slightly updated with the details of Obama's parents' marriage.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Health Care On the Line, Obama Heads to Massachusetts

FOXNews.com

The president, whose political muscle has weakened amid the still struggling economy and his push for a controversial health care package, will see much of his legislative agenda threatened if Democrat Martha Coakley loses the Massachusetts Senate race to Republican Scott Brown.

President Obama is headed to Massachusetts Sunday to campaign for Democrat Martha Coakley, whose race against Republican Scott Brown has narrowed to a toss-up as voters zero in on the cost of a massive health insurance bill in Congress.

"Regardless of who wins we have here in effect a referendum on this national health care bill," Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told "Fox News Sunday." "The American people are saying please don't pass it."

Obama and Coakley planned to appear together at a Sunday afternoon rally at Northeastern University in Boston. Democrats are hoping the president's popularity with young people will reinvigorate the case for Coakley, whose lost her edge to Brown in recent polling.

Coakley has been criticized for not engaging enough in retail politics and not buying enough advertising as Brown has moved from riding around the state in an old pickup truck to a tour bus where he continues his stops at pancake breakfasts and diners.

With polling -- and momentum -- seemingly breaking toward Brown, he has become the target of a scathing attack ad that accuses him of wanting to turn rape victims away from hospitals because as a state senator he supported a conscience clause that would have allowed medical workers to refuse to give "day-after" pills to end pregnancies.

The last time a Republican won a Senate seat in the state was in 1972. Special elections are generally lower-turnout races and Democrats are doing what they can to stimulate reliable voters in a state that is about 50 percent unaffiliated.

Obama is personally popular in the state, but his job approval rating is 48 percent. Only 36 percent of Massachusetts voters approve of the health care bill wending its way through Congress.

Campaigning Saturday, Coakley, the state's attorney general, called Obama's visit "pretty cool" but said it didn't indicate her candidacy was in trouble.

"I don't think he has to come, I think he wanted to come. He was excited to come," Coakley told reporters. "Who wouldn't want the president of the United States campaigning for her in a historic race?"

If Brown becomes the 41st Republican in the U.S. Senate, that means Congress will have only a few days to pass a bill that he could effectively stop as the key vote in the filibuster process. However, Republicans have expressed concern that the state's Democratic leadership could hold up the certification process that would seat Brown in the Senate post held by the late Sen. Ted Kennedy for 47 years.

"The first step is to see what the people of Massachusetts say on Tuesday and then look at the process for seating," McConnell said. "Whoever it is should be sworn in promptly."

Coakley campaigned Saturday with Kennedy's widow, Vicky, who has also appeared in a television ad for Coakley. On Friday thousands attended a rally for Coakley headlined by former President Bill Clinton and the state's senior senator, John Kerry.

Since taking office a year ago, Obama's track record for helping other Democrats hasn't been stellar. He campaigned hard for New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine who ran for re-election last year and in Virginia for Creigh Deeds, the Democratic nominee to replace outgoing Democratic Gov. Tim Kaine. Both lost.

The president was also rebuffed after making a high profile pitch for his home city of Chicago to host the 2016 Olympics. After traveling to Copenhagen last fall to personally make the city's case, the International Olympic Committee rejected Chicago's bid on the first ballot.

Nonetheless, the joint appearance by Obama and Coakley is in many ways marriage of a necessity.

Coakley is depending on his star power to boost Democratic turnout, particularly among blue collar and minority voters who might not be motivated to vote. And Obama, whose political muscle has weakened amid the still struggling economy and his push for a controversial health care package, will see much of his legislative agenda threatened if Coakley loses.

Campaigning Saturday, Brown appeared unconcerned about Obama's visit.

"I hope he has a safe trip and enjoys himself and has a good trip looking around a great state," Brown said.

During Obama's appearance, Brown planned to campaign in Worcester, a blue collar city in central Massachusetts.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Friday, January 15, 2010

The Massachusetts "miracle" could become a reality for Republicans!

Updated January 15, 2010

Coakley Suffers Setbacks in Final Week of Senate Campaign

FOXNews.com

A late surge by Republican Scott Brown has stripped away the sense of inevitability his Democratic opponent, Martha Coakley, once had in the race for U.S. senator in Massachusetts.

A late surge by Republican Scott Brown has stripped away the sense of inevitability his Democratic opponent, Martha Coakley, once had in the race for U.S. senator in Massachusetts.

Polls show the race is now a dead heat, and the most recent survey has Brown leading by 4 points. The Republican state senator has all the momentum -- he's reportedly raising money at a rate of $1 million a day -- and there's no shortage of criticism in political circles for the way Coakley and her allies have run her campaign.

Just one month ago, Coakley, the state's attorney general, was considered a shoo-in to claim the U.S. Senate seat formerly held by the late Sen. Ted Kennedy.

"Who could have foreseen this a month ago? ... This is absolutely amazing," said Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics. "(Coakley's) problem is they've got to motivate Democrats."

Coakley's campaign has been plagued by missteps, big and small, that may have given Brown an opening.

She's been broadly criticized for not being aggressive enough, particularly when Brown's campaign put up a brazen ad late last month comparing his campaign for a Democratic seat to John F. Kennedy's campaign nearly 60 years ago for what was then a Republican seat.

Asked if her campaign was going too soft, Coakley may have made another blunder.

"As opposed to standing outside Fenway Park? In the cold? Shaking hands?'' she told The Boston Globe, in what appeared to be a reference to Brown's campaigning style.

Former Red Sox pitcher Curt Schilling, a figure of considerable stature in baseball-mad New England, picked up on that line and blasted Coakley as an elitist who wasn't trying hard enough to win the seat.

"She's apparently been trying to win the title of Worst Political Campaign Ever, and she might have just clinched it with her little dig at Scott Brown over Fenway Park," Schilling wrote on his blog.

The Democratic Party's heavy hitters, meanwhile, have kicked into overdrive, with top senators appealing to supporters for donations and former President Bill Clinton joining up with Massachusetts' senior senator, John Kerry, for a Friday afternoon rally.

Democrats warn that a Brown win could torpedo health care reform and other Obama administration initiatives, since he would break the Democrats' 60-vote, filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. "This is our wake-up call," Kerry said in a recent fundraising e-mail.

"Martha's vote is critical to getting health care and the rest of President Obama's agenda passed," Kerry wrote.

But Murphy's law seems to have prevailed over the past week.

-- A Coakley supporter knocked over a reporter from the Weekly Standard in full view of the cameras outside a Washington fundraiser Tuesday. Coakley said she didn't see it, but a photograph of the incident appeared to show her looking in the direction of the reporter when he fell. Her supporter later apologized.

-- Coakley was quoted at that fundraiser saying a loss in Massachusetts would be "hell" for Democrats in the 2010 elections. She denied she said it, but observers in the room confirmed that she had.

-- Coakley's campaign even misspelled Massachusetts in one of her ads, an error quickly pointed out by Republicans.

It's not clear whether President Obama will make a trip to Massachusetts to campaign before Tuesday's election; the White House insists nothing is planned. But the president did come to Coakley's aid by cutting an online video for her, calling on supporters to put on their "walking shoes" and bring out people to vote.

"In Washington, I'm fighting to curb the abuses of a health insurance industry that routinely denies care," Obama said. "I'm fighting for financial reforms to stop Wall Street from playing havoc with our economy. I'm fighting to create a new, clean energy economy.

"And it's clear now that the outcome of these and other fights will probably rest on one vote in the United States Senate."

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Obama Muscles into Massachusetts Senate Race


NEWSMAX.COM
By: David A. Patten


In a bid to stave off a potential political disaster, President Barack Obama and his allies are mounting a last-ditch effort to thwart state Sen. Scott Brown's bid to score a "Massachusetts miracle" by winning the late Ted Kennedy's Senate seat in next Tuesday's special election.

Brown is vying to wrest the once-invulnerable "Kennedy seat" away from Democrats and Attorney General Martha Coakley, thereby stripping Democrats of their super-majority in the Senate.

To counter Brown's skyrocketing momentum – Brown's campaign has raised more than $1.3 million in the past 24 hours, most of it from small donors – the president has jumped into the race behind the scenes. Obama blasted his massive campaign e-mail list with a letter praising Coakley and seeking support. Also, his Twitter feed urged supporters to make phone calls promoting Coakley's candidacy.

So far the president has shied away from campaign directly on Coakley's behalf in Massachusetts. But Brown says that may be about to change.

"I understand that he may be coming this weekend," Brown told Fox News host Neil Cavuto on Wednesday. "President Clinton is here. Everybody who is part of the political establishment in Massachusetts is rallying around her … she'll be a Washington insider and be part of the political establishment down there, be the 60th vote, shut off debate, ram things through."

In his appearance on Fox, Brown painted himself as a determined underdog fighting the Massachusetts Democratic establishment, and openly pleaded for support.

"If people want to help, I need their help, nationally, locally – to fight the machine," he said.

That Democrats are pulling out all the stops to win a race in dark blue Massachusetts is a shocker. Several polls now show the race is now too close to call.

A Rasmussen Reports poll on Tuesday, for example, shows Coakley winning 49 percent of the vote, compared to Brown's 47 percent – within the poll's 2.7 percent margin of error. That means if the election were held today, it would be too close to call.

A Public Policy Polling survey shows Brown with a 1 percent lead, while a Boston Globe poll published Jan. 10 showed Coakley with a 15-point lead.

It would be a historic win for the GOP: The last time a Republican represented Massachusetts in the U.S. Senate was in 1980.

The political stakes could hardly be higher. A Coakley defeat would be a devastating blow to Democrats' plans to transform national governance. It would further alarm already-skittish Democrats about their electoral prospects in the November midterm elections, and would cost Democrats the 60th vote that they may need to pass their healthcare reform compromise.

Boston University's Tobe Berkowitz tells Newsmax that a Brown upset would be "a seismic event," adding: "It would dwarf [GOP gubernatorial wins in] Virginia and New Jersey. And basically, people should start investing in U-Haul, because there's going to be a lot of orange trucks down there in Washington in November 2010, if Brown wins this race."

Berkowitz, a professor of communications and politics in Boston, predicts that Obama's influence will boost Coakley, but probably not enough to be decisive.

"If you look at Obama putting his muscle behind this, and Clinton actually showing up," he says, "it tends to generally get good press and that can help dispel the 'Coakley's in dire straits story' that is starting to emerge." Yet now that voters have awakened to just how close the contest may be, Berkowitz says outside influences probably won't determine the outcome.

"What's happened is, voters have started to focus on it because now it is suddenly a race," he tells Newsmax. "While it was once a fait accompli, voters see now they actually have a role in this. How it will actually turn out remains to be seen."

The race is complicated by the fact that an independent candidate whose last name is Kennedy – unrelated to the late senator and the Camelot legacy – also appears on the ballot.

While independent candidate Joe Kennedy is polling less than 5 percent of the vote, that could be enough to change the outcome in a tight contest. Only 2 percent of Massachusetts voters say they're undecided. While professing confidence, Democrats and their allies are pulling out all the stops.

Sources tell TheHill.com that the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) poured more than $500,000 into an ad buy for Coakley on Tuesday. Democratic leaders have dispatched high-level coordinators to Massachusetts, in an effort to pump up a Democratic base that has been uninspired since the party captured the White House.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass, joined in Tuesday, sending out fundraising e-mails on Coakley's behalf.
The Hill reports the AFL-CIO held an urgent conference call earlier this week to discuss the race.

"There's no question that the race is tightening," AFL-CIO political director Karen Ackerman told TheHill. "The stakes are really big here. I think there's no reason to take chances on losing the 60th vote in the Senate."

Immediately after the campaign's last debate on Monday, Coakley's campaign went sharply negative, issuing a TV ad that asks: "Who is Scott Brown, really?"

The ad, an obvious effort to link Brown to the Republican establishment, features pictures of former President George W. Bush and former Vice President Dick Cheney, as well as Rush Limbaugh. It also suggests Brown opposes emergency contraception for women who have suffered rape.

Brown's two daughters made an appeal for Coakley to cancel the ad, calling it "completely inaccurate and misleading."

In another indication of rising tensions over the race, Weekly Standard correspondent John McCormack reported that he was roughed up and pushed to the ground Tuesday outside a Washington, D.C., fundraiser for Coakley, when he persisted in asking her whether she stood by a recent remark that no terrorists remain in Afghanistan. Coakley later claimed she didn't see what happened to McCormack, although a picture widely posted on the Internet of the incident suggested otherwise.

Coakley has stumbled over the war in Afghanistan in the campaign's waning days. On Monday she said: "If the goal was and the mission in Afghanistan was to go in because we believed that the Taliban was giving harbor to terrorists. We supported that. I supported that. They’re gone. They’re not there anymore.”

Coakley is calling for the Obama administration to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan. Brown supports the president's decision to send in additional troops.

Conservative bloggers jumped on that statement, pointing out that seven CIA officers died in a suicide bombing in southeastern Afghanistan on Dec. 30.

According to the PlumLine blog, Coakley's campaign and the Democratic National Committee have issued an "urgent" appeal to leading national Democratic donors. The fund-raising pitch warns that internal polling reflects a "very tight" race.

None of these developments seems to be slowing Brown's momentum, however. On Tuesday he collected endorsements from two police unions in Worcester, Mass., suggesting Coakley's labor support is not monolithic.

Brown is hammering away on the fact that as a senator he might be able to block Democratic healthcare reforms, which polls show are unpopular in Massachusetts.

"In Massachusetts we already have insurance," Brown told Cavuto. "We have 98 percent of our people insured. So why are we in fact [going to] cut Medicare half a trillion [dollars], have longer lines, lesser coverage, subsidize other states – it makes no sense. It's not good for Massachusetts, and the backroom deals are certainly not good for the country. And people have lost faith in the process."

If Brown wins, it is unclear whether Democrats would be able to drag out certifying his victory long enough to squeeze the healthcare compromise through the Senate.

Berkowitz says the winner will be determined by two factors: attracting persuadable voters and getting out the vote.

"It's all about last-minute switching of soft supporters, and then it's really about turnout and get out the vote on Tuesday," he says.

Some pundits caution that Republicans may regret turning the race into a national referendum on healthcare reform. Democrats who otherwise would sit out a special election will be energized to turn out to vote, they say.

Yet Berkowitz says the Obama administration's effort to tilt the scales in Coakley's favor may arriving too late.

"They're really trying to ride to rescue at last minute," he says. "This is trying to pull the candidate off the tracks, and the train is starting to roar down on them."


© Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Massachusetts Poll: Republican Brown up by ONE point

January 09, 2010
Categories:

Poll: Scott Brown ahead of Martha Coakley by 1 point

Republicans have a very real chance at orchestrating a Massachusetts miracle in this month’s special Senate election to determine Ted Kennedy’s successor, at least according to a new Democratic poll out tonight.

The shocking poll from Public Policy Polling shows Republican state Sen. Scott Brown leading Democratic Attorney General Martha Coakley by 1 point, 48 percent to 47 percent, which would mean the race is effectively tied.

Among independents, who make up 51 percent of the electorate in the Bay State, Brown leads Coakley 63 percent to 31 percent.

Just 50 percent of voters view Coakley favorably, while 42 percent viewing her unfavorably.

Brown, who began an advertising blitz this month, sports a strong 57 percent favorability rating, with just 25 percent viewing him unfavorably — very strong numbers for a Republican in the heavily Democratic state.

On the issue of health care, which Brown has emphasized that he would be the deciding vote against, 47 percent said they opposed the plan in Congress, while 41 percent supported it.

A Rasmussen Reports survey from earlier this week had showed Coakley's lead down to 9 points, and in last night’s debate she had questioned the accuracy of those numbers, suggesting her margin of victory would in fact be larger.

The survey of 744 likely voters was conducted January 7-9 and had a margin of error of 3.6 percent.

In his analysis, pollster Tom Jensen noted that Coakley is suffering from a less-than-excited Democratic electorate, a dynamic similar to the gubernatorial contests in New Jersey and Virginia that Democrats lost last year.

“The Massachusetts Senate race is shaping up as a potential disaster for Democrats,” said PPP pollster Dean Debnam.. “Martha Coakley’s complacent campaign has put Scott Brown in a surprisingly strong position and she will need to step it up in the final week to win a victory once thought inevitable.”

— Jessica Taylor and Josh Kraushaar

Blue to Red: Massachusetts Senate Race

By Richard Baehr
AmericanThinker.com





American Thinker will be covering the 2010 midterm elections, with featured articles on Republican challengers for Senate, House, and Governor's races. We will also focus on hotly contested races where Republican-held seats are at risk. The GOP now holds 40 Senate seats, 178 House seats, and 24 Governor's chairs. After the 2010 census, some states will gain House seats and others will lose them. Having more GOP governors will ensure a role in the redistricting process at the state level. So will winning control of more state legislative chambers. To take back control from the Democrats, a pickup of 40 seats in the House and 11 in the Senate is required. In 2012, of the 33 senators up for reelection, only nine are Republicans. If the GOP picks up a significant number of Senate seats in 2010, they could gain control in a target-rich environment in 2012 (Jim Webb, Ben Nelson, John Tester, and Claire McCaskill).

Given what the Democrats have done in 2009 with control of the presidency and strong majorities in both Houses of Congress, it is incumbent that conservatives vote in 2010 and change the political dynamic.

An unusual opportunity now presents itself in the special election for U.S. Senator in Massachusetts, to take place on Tuesday, January 19. Republican Scott Brown is in striking range of Martha Coakley for the Senate seat once held by the late Ted Kennedy and now held by appointed interim Senator Paul Kirk. Massachusetts is not a Republican-friendly state. It voted for Obama over McCain by 26%. There are zero Republicans in the ten-member U.S House delegation (there are zero U.S. House Republicans in all of New England at the moment!). In the state legislature, Democrats control 90% of the seats. They used that majority to change the state law and allow the Democratic Governor Deval Patrick to appoint an immediate replacement for Kennedy in the period before a special election was held, allowing Democrats to maintain the 60th Senate seat and break the GOP filibuster on health care reform. That maneuver did not go down all that well, given that the legislature passed a bill in 2004 requiring a special election and taking away the ability of the governor to fill a vacant Senate seat. That step was taken to ensure that then GOP Governor Mitt Romney could not appoint a Republican to fill out John Kerry's term had he been elected president in 2004. Some hypocritical acts by politicians stink worse than others.

Republicans have won governor's races in Massachusetts (to keep the legislature honest), and Ronald Reagan carried the state in 1980 and 1984. But there has not been a GOP senator since Ed Brooke in the early 1970s.

Three polls taken last week give different reads on the race. Scott Rasmussen has Coakley up by 9%. PPP, a Democratic-leaning polling group, shows Brown up 1%. A Boston Globe poll, the earliest one of the three in the field, showed Coakley up 15%. Each survey shows that Brown's supporters are far more motivated than Coakley's. There are rumors of other polls that show a tied race, or Coakley up by a bit more than 10%. Special elections are difficult to forecast. Turnout is low, even for an off-year election. Only the most motivated voters tend to show up, especially in winter. National Democrats are now fearful of a huge upset and a 41st Republican senator -- enough to stop the health care bill with a filibuster when it comes back for one final vote in the Senate. Suddenly there was talk of the governor and his henchmen delaying Brown's certification if he wins and having Kirk vote for the bill if it comes up after the date of the election, but before Brown is declared the winner.

This latest proposed jujitsu by the Democrats has not played out well in Massachusetts. When Red Auerbach turned the heat up to 95 degrees in the Lakers' locker room at the Boston Garden during the NBA finals in 1984, Celtic fans were not concerned by this application of "home court edge." But the idea that an elected senator would be held in limbo is heating up the talk radio airwaves in the Bay State.

Getting the Senate and the House to agree to the final version of a health care bill that can pass in both chambers is proving more difficult than anticipated. The House liberals are unhappy with features in the Senate version of the bill, especially the tax on "Cadillac plans." The abortion language in the Senate version was enough for Nebraska Senator Ben Nelson to swallow (washed down with extra Medicaid funding for eternity), but it may not be acceptable to Bart Stupak and a handful of pro-life Democrats in the House. The House bill passed by a narrow margin of 220-215. The Senate bill got exactly the 60 votes needed for cloture. Given the spate of recent Democratic retirements in the Senate and the House, and the shift of an Alabama Congressman to the GOP, a loss in the Massachusetts Senate race would cause grave indigestion for Democrats from the White House to Capitol Hill. It would likely accelerate the rush to the exit by Democrats in tough races in 2010, creating more open seats -- the easiest for the Republicans to pick up.

As the news of the tightening race has gone national, liberal interest groups and the unions have flooded the state with robo-calls, paid ads, and campaign workers. One robo-call is a push poll, asking voters if it would affect their choice if they knew that hate groups backed Scott Brown. The charge is nonsense, but valuable time is lost denying the charge, and the parties paying for spreading the garbage have tried to have their fingerprints wiped. President Obama's favorite union, the SEIU, may be behind the effort.

There is one week to go before the special election. If you went to contribute to the Scott Brown campaign , you can do it here. You can also help with phone calls, the get-out-the-vote effort, and other volunteer activities.

Before Sunday, the New England Patriots had won 22 straight home games and had not lost a home playoff game since 1978. Then they got blown out by the Ravens 33-14. Long winning streaks can come to an end. Doug Hoffman came out of nowhere to almost win the 23rd district House race in New York. A chance to win a Senate seat in Massachusetts does not come around all that often. Help if you can.

Richard Baehr is chief political correspondent of American Thinker.