Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Michael Savage asks but where is the rest of the media?

Chronicle Watch.com

March 31, 2010 by Roberto Santiago  

Earth to Media, Earth to Media, Come in Media, We have Terrorist Training who are Muslims in America! PS, they are not Christians they are Islamic's!

Why is it that Michael Savage is alone in asking these questions??

FEDERAL AGENTS RAID CHRISTIAN COMPOUND – – IGNORE ISLAMBERG
MUSLIM GUERRILLA TRAINING IGNORED
ISLAMIC MILITARY COMPOUNDS FLOURISH IN US
by Paul L. Williams, Ph.D.

Federal agents raided a Michigan-based Christian militia after learning that members of the group – – known as the Hutaree – – may have been plotting to kill police officers.
But the same agents have been unwilling to raid Islamberg and other compounds of Jamaat ul-Fuqra where militant Muslims engage in paramilitary training for the great Jihad against Christians and Jews.



These compounds are scattered throughout the United States. Many have been in existence for more than twenty years.

Neighbors have lodged hundreds of complaints to local law enforcement officials about the rat-tat-tat of machine gun fire and the sounds of explosions coming from these sites but no intrepid federal or state agents have been willing to conduct investigations, let alone to make arrests.


This is extraordinary since members of Jamaat ul-Fuqra, the Islamic organization that runs these compounds, have been convicted in US courts of such crimes as homicide, conspiracy to commit murder, firebombing, gun smuggling, grand theft, counterfeiting, and workers’ compensation fraud. Others remain leading suspects in criminal cases throughout the country, including ten unsolved assassinations and seventeen fire-bombings between 1979 and 1990.
No Islamic group, not even al Qaeda, has been responsible for more attacks on American soil.
Islamberg is located on 70 acres of dense forest at the foothills of the Catskill Mountains on the outskirts of Hancock, New York.

The hillside is blighted by rusty trailers that appear to be without power or running water and a number of outhouses. The scent of raw sewage is in the air.


The place is even off limits to the local undertaker who says that he has delivered bodies to the complex but has never been granted entrance. “They come and take the bodies from my hearse. They won’t allow me to get past the sentry post. They say that they want to prepare the bodies for burial. But I never get the bodies back. I don’t know what’s going on there but I don’t think it’s legal.”
 

On the other side of the hill where few dare to go is a tiny village replete with a make-shift learning center (dubbed the “International Quranic Open University”); a trailer converted into a Laundromat; a small, green community center; a small and rather squalid grocery store; a newly constructed majid; over forty clapboard homes; and scores of additional trailers.


It is home to hundreds – – all in Islamic attire, and all African-Americans. Most drive late model SUVs with license plates from Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, South Carolina, and Tennessee. The locals say that some work as tollbooth operators for the New York State Thruway, while others are employed at a credit card processing center that maintains confidential financial records.

While it buzzing with activity during the week, the place becomes a virtual hive on weekends. The guest includes arrivals from the inner cities of New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania and, occasionally, white-robed dignitaries in Ray-Bans from the Middle East.
At the eastern perimeter of the property is a training course was equipped with ropes hanging from tall trees, wooden fences for scaling, a make-shift obstacle course, and a firing range.
The compound also contains vast underground bunkers.


Islamberg is benign as neither a Buddhist monastery nor a Carmelite convent. Nearly every weekend, neighbors hear sounds of gunfire. Some, including a combat veteran of the Vietnam War, have heard the bang of small explosives.

None of the neighbors wished to be identified for fear of “retaliation.” “We don’t even dare to slow down when we drive by,” one resident said. “They own the mountain and they know it and there is nothing we can do about it but move, and we can’t even do that. Who wants to buy a property near that?”

The complex serves to scare the bejeesus out of the local residents. “If you go there, you better wear body armor,” a customer at the Circle E Diner in Hancock said. “They have armed guards and if they shoot you, nobody will find your body.”


At Cousins, a watering hole in nearby Deposit, a barfly, who didn’t wish to be identified, said: “The place is dangerous. You can hear gunfire up there. I can’t understand why the FBI won’t shut it down.”
The photographs that accompany this article were shot by Paul L. Williams and his team of investigators who entered the compound to verify the reality of the threat.

Williams and his team have visited other Jamaat ul-Fuqra sites, including compounds in Red House, Virginia, and Commerce, Georgia.


Paramilitary training with automatic and semi-automatic weapons (including M-14s and AK-47s) takes place at all of these sites.

Many of the Muslim recruits come from the prison system.

After weeks of training in weaponry, hand-to-hand combat, and explosives, select recruits are sent to Pakistan for further training.

NOTE: This posting was hurriedly made after a conversation with our gracious and learned friend Dr. Michael Savage this evening (Tues. March 30, 2010).
Coming Soon” “Jihad in the U.S. Military”
Stay tuned!



Related Reading:

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Muslim Groups Outrageously Outraged That FBI Used Dog In Raid On Puppy-Shooting Imam

Mere Rhetoric

It's probably unfair to call this sharia-advocating radical cleric a puppy shooter. The animal he tried to put three bullets into - this in the course of an FBI raid targeting him on weapons charges - was probably a full-grown dog. Still though. He tried to kill a dog.

That said, I don't doubt the outrage. The antipathy to puppies thing is pretty well established in these circles. Ahmadinejad uses it as an anti-Western insult, presumably including even those Westerners who really, really want to appease him. There were those UK Muslim students who threatened to kill the dog of an epileptic student-teacher, which the school responded to by developing better "communication" so as to avoid "misunderstandings." And Lebanese Arabs were somewhat petulantly willing to starve themselves rather than eat Iranian food aid that sniffer-dogs had cleared.

But you'd think American Muslims would be more concerned about how the Dearborn community nurtured a high-profile criminal imam who wanted to transform the US into a sharia state. Or about how he was swimming in stolen goods and illegalweapons. But nope. It's the dog that bothers them:

The indictment identified Abdullah, 53, also known as Christopher Thomas, as "a highly placed leader of a nationwide radical fundamentalist Sunni group" that sought to establish a separate state within the United States governed by Sharia law. Muslim and community groups have accused the FBI of excessive force in the raid... Among the concerns is the number of gunshot wounds detailed in the medical examiner's report and the fact Abdullah's corpse was left handcuffed while an FBI dog allegedly shot by Abdullah was airlifted for medical treatment...

Agents would have been justified in firing if Abdullah had reached for a weapon, let alone having brandished a weapon and fired three shots, as Stejskal said he understands Abdullah did... In a space of three to four seconds, four agents fired an average of five shots each, striking Abdullah 20 times, with one shot creating two wounds for a total of 21 entry wounds...

Nabih Ayad, an attorney representing Abdullah's widow, said it was needlessly confrontational to send a dog after Abdullah because Muslims view dogs as unclean and anyone attacked by a dog could react violently. Stejskal said he thought the concern about the use of the dog would be more legitimate if Abdullah was a Muslim from the Mideast, rather than an American who converted while in prison.

The entire incident is under investigation by the civil rights division of the U.S. Justice Department. Because a radical arms-running imam was shot by FBI agents after he took potshots at them - there was probably some racism involved there. How soon before Muslim communities start making the mere existence of anything dog-related a civil rights issue, ala the problems Europeans are having with anything pig-related? "The pet store in our neighborhood is selling dog potty pads! Racists!"

References and related after the jump...

References:
* Ahmadinejad: Remember, enemies are like dogs [YNet]
* Muslim Student Threatens To Kill Epileptic Student-Teacher's Service Dog. Epileptic Student-Teacher Flees Job. [MR]
* Lebanon: "Starving" Palestinians Refuse Massive Delivery of Food aid Because Sniffer-Dogs Were Used to Search it for Weapons.... [Weasel Zippers]
* FBI followed protocol in imam's shooting in Dearborn, ex-agent says [Detroit News]
* Dutch Muslim Schoolchildren Riot After Being Told Pigs Exist [MR]

Sunday, February 14, 2010

A Sure-Fire Legal Recipe for Airport Insecurity

Townhall.com
By: Debra J. Saunders

Last August, Nicholas George, 22, was getting ready to fly from Pennsylvania to Pomona College in Claremont, Calif., when TSA agents found Arabic-English flash cards in his pocket -- the 200 cards included such words as "bomb" and "explosive" -- two stereo speakers in his carry-on bag, a Jordanian student ID card and a passport that showed he had visited Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Malaysia and Sudan. TSA agents detained George for questioning. They determined he was not a security threat and released him less than five hours later. Now, he is suing.

Of course the ACLU is representing George. The group explained in a press release that episodes like George's "may actually make us less safe, by diverting vital resources and attention away from true security threats."

Nonsense. If ever there was a person you want the TSA to look at very carefully, it's a young male who has Arabic flashcards with words like "bomb" in his pocket, studied in Jordan and recently spent time in Sudan, a country that the State Department believes to sponsor terrorism. Add the fact that George had stereo speakers -- remember an explosive-laden tape recorder was used to bring down Pam Am Flight 103 in 1988 -- in his carry-on luggage, and it would amount to professional malpractice if TSA and FBI agents did not search and question George.

When I first read this story, I had to wonder if, in a world with no shortage of individuals hungry to be victims or discredit the system, the young man was trying to be detained

ACLU attorney Mary Catherine Roper assured me that George is not the type of person who would try to start trouble. If he had wanted to get the TSA's attention, she said, "There are far more provocative things he could have done than having flashcards in his pocket."

Fair enough, but surely the ACLU understands why the TSA would want to question and search George. Her answer: Not really. Roper thinks the TSA was right to search his speakers, but because they contained no explosives, airport security should have let him on the plane.

"Learning the Arabic language and traveling to the Middle East as a college student, I don't think that's a suspicious circumstance," Roper explained.

You know, I'm one of those people who has no patience for people who complain every time a white grandmother undergoes a TSA search, because profiling doesn't always work.

But that doesn't mean TSA agents are supposed to wear blinders. George's passport alone -- which he did not have to show to board a domestic flight -- should warrant extra scrutiny. Without the "bomb" flashcard.

Roper maintains that after the initial questioning, TSA agents should have understood George was an American student with a Middle Eastern Studies major -- and promptly let him catch his plane. Instead, TSA and Philadelphia police detained and questioned George -- who, according to the TSA, had been flagged because he exhibited fear reflexes -- until the FBI questioned him.

(As an aside: The ACLU complaint claims that authorities never Mirandized George during the nearly five hours he was held. That would mean that authorities were faster to Mirandize accused Christmas Day bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab than George. That means authorities questioned George longer than Abdulmutallab without Mirandizing him.)

According to the complaint, a TSA supervisor questioned George "in a hostile and aggressive manner," while he was "polite and calm." Also, FBI agents questioned George to see if he was involved with any "pro-Islamic groups," then determined George was not a threat. However, the complaint alleges that FBI questions were "wide-ranging and strayed far from any conceivable criminal activity."

Boo-hoo. "Nick is not claiming to have been scarred for life. No one is trying to get rich off this," Roper told me. And: "What this is about is accountability."

You see, if learning Arabic or traveling to the Middle East is enough to get you handcuffed and questioned by the FBI, then -- Roper said this -- "the terrorists have won."

Au contraire; if TSA staff, airport cops and FBI agents -- the plaintiffs in this lawsuit -- are afraid to do their jobs, then terrorists will win.

Look no further than Fort Hood, Texas. Colleagues were afraid to report the radicalized rants of Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, lest they seem anti-Islamic, so they looked the other way. The toll: 13 dead.

Now, I won't say that the Philly security team did everything right. If George's claim of remaining handcuffed for two hours is true, that is excessive. But if the student truly wants accountability, he can complain through the proper channels about abusive treatment. If his goal, however, is to cow airport security folks so that they'll be afraid to question some kid with an "I h Jihad" t-shirt and a boarding pass, then this lawsuit is the perfect venue.

.

Monday, February 8, 2010

Protected by the justice system, a would-be bomber still talks

The Boston Globe
Globe Editoral


THE NEWS that the would-be airplane bomber, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, has resumed cooperation with the FBI validates the Justice Department’s decision to charge him in federal court rather than a military commission. And the creative methods employed by the FBI to obtain his cooperation refute the notion - advanced with much tub-thumping anger on talk radio - that a defendant in the criminal justice system is somehow off limits to interrogators seeking information about terrorist plots.

The FBI shrewdly sought out relatives of Abdulmutallab in Nigeria who were willing to come to the United States and prevail on him to tell what he knows about Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Using family members to turn the defendant into a cooperative informant highlighted a crucial element of the interrogator’s craft: the need to establish trust between a questioner and a prisoner. The flipping of Abdulmutallab proved what intelligence professionals know well: that psychological methods of interrogation are almost always more effective than the rough stuff seen in the movies.

Senator Scott Brown and some other Republicans have castigated the Obama administration, originally, because Abdulmutallab was read his Miranda rights and allowed to “lawyer up’’ after an initial 50-minute interrogation. But if he had been turned over to a military commission, he would have had to receive the very same protections. The 50 minutes of FBI questioning without an attorney present were legally permissible only under a public safety exemption, which allowed agents to ask about such things as other explosives on Abdulmutallab’s flight or terrorists on other incoming flights.

Under the Bush administration, more than 300 terrorists were convicted in the criminal justice system, and shoe-bomber Richard Reid was granted his Miranda rights in the first five minutes of his capture. Politicians who tried to raise a ruckus about the Justice Department’s handling of the Abdulmutallab case either didn’t know that history, ignored the questionable legal status of military commissions, or failed to appreciate how effective FBI investigators really are.

Friday, January 15, 2010

FBI Issues Digital Mug Shot of Aging Bin Laden

This digitally enhanced image shows what a clean-shaven
Usama bin-Laden could look like today.

Friday, January 15, 2010
Fox News.com

Usama bin Laden has aged a little since he was last seen in September 2007 but has put on little or no weight in the arid surroundings of the Afghan-Pakistani border — that, at least, is the assumption made by FBI forensic artists as the agency continues its relentless search for the Al Qaeda leader.

Digitally enhanced photographs have been released showing how he might look today; one in his traditional outfit, the other showing him with trimmed beard and Western clothing.

The "age-progression images" were produced in the latest effort to find the elusive terrorist chief. FBI forensic artists modified bin Laden's facial features to show what they might look like today.

"It is our hope that these digitally enhanced images will help someone recognise these terrorist suspects and then contact the Rewards for Justice program with information that leads to their apprehension," Robert Eckert, assistant director for Diplomatic Security's Threat Information and Analysis Directorate, said.

Bin Laden's last 30-minute video released in 2007, which was itself released after an absence of three years, saw him sporting a trimmed beard rather than the straggly and seemingly unkempt appearance he seemed to be wearing in 2004.

Click here for more on this story from the Times of London.