from: Israel Matzav
Carl in Jerusalem
Tell me this isn't deja vu all over again. 70 years ago, the Times of London decided that there were 'moderate Nazis.'
But meanwhile, back in the real world, do you remember when The Times (the London one of course) felt that Hitler was a moderate making concessions to ingratiate himself with the “radical” wing of his own Nazi party. Yes, you heard that right, upon implementing another plank in his plans to eradicate Jews (as meticulously documented years before in Mein Kampf), The Times wrote:Hamas and Fatah. The 'political' and 'military' wings of Hamas, Fatah and Hezbullah. 'Moderate Palestinians.' Those who don't learn from history are destined to repeat it. Read the whole thing.
The new laws, while in line with anti-Semitism which has been a large part of the Fuhrer’s inspiration from the beginning are no doubt to be taken as an encouragement to the Radical wing of the party.Let that sink in: if the Nazi party had a “Radical wing” (their capitalisation) are they seriously suggesting there was a moderate form of Nazi-ism? They concluded their article by trying to find the silver lining for the Jews of Germany:
The best to be said of the new laws is that they may offer German Jewry the process of law in place of arbitrary bullying and local tyranny.And we all know where the trains to carry out that “process of law” ended for six million people.
posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 1:52 AM
Note:
Has the Obama "team", when speaking to the "new" Quartet, decided how Israel should negotiate peace with Fatah/Hamas? Perhaps the queston should be "Why?" Why would the State of Israel expect peace from those who refuse to recognize her very existence? Isn't that like asking America to negotiate with al Qaeda? Terrorists do not "negotiate". Some terrorists may even attempt to by-pass negotiations by addressing the United Nations, hoping to gain land and statehood!
Heck, the Arabs have already gained Gaza and portions of Judea and Samara - what next? Jerusalem?! Peace Agreements, the Oslo Accords are merely scraps of paper not worth one cent, for those accords have been broken by the Arab PLO/Palestinians numerous times and continue to this day. So, here's a question: "How does any Agreement for Peace remain in tact, when it is a one-sided agreement?"
Yes, I see history repeating itself and the question is: "Who among us - America and Israel - will be the first to say to terrorists, "No! Never again!" The Oslo Accords are nonsense; worthless; and it gained nothing but grief for the State of Israel, since Hamas and the Arab Palestinians continue to murder Israeli citizens. There isn't a "moderate" among the Fatah/Hamas unity! Their intentions, in their own words, is to conquer the Land of Israel and kill all Jews. What's not to understand?
Heck, the Arabs have already gained Gaza and portions of Judea and Samara - what next? Jerusalem?! Peace Agreements, the Oslo Accords are merely scraps of paper not worth one cent, for those accords have been broken by the Arab PLO/Palestinians numerous times and continue to this day. So, here's a question: "How does any Agreement for Peace remain in tact, when it is a one-sided agreement?"
Yes, I see history repeating itself and the question is: "Who among us - America and Israel - will be the first to say to terrorists, "No! Never again!" The Oslo Accords are nonsense; worthless; and it gained nothing but grief for the State of Israel, since Hamas and the Arab Palestinians continue to murder Israeli citizens. There isn't a "moderate" among the Fatah/Hamas unity! Their intentions, in their own words, is to conquer the Land of Israel and kill all Jews. What's not to understand?
