Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Taliban Leader in Peace Talks Was Impostor


Oct. 7: Afghan President Hamid Karzai, center, prays with members of the Afghanistan peace council in Kabul.


Published November 23, 2010
| Associated Press

Source:  Fox News

KABUL, Afghanistan -- A man leading the Taliban side of peace talks with the Afghan government was an impersonator, an Afghan close to the negotiations said Tuesday, an embarrassing revelation for Afghan officials who have promoted reconciliation efforts as the best chance for ending the war.

Quickly moving to do damage control, President Hamid Karzai dismissed the reports as "propaganda," saying neither he nor any other members of his government had ever met with a man named Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansour -- one of highest ranking members of the Taliban council leading the insurgency.


The report about the impostor first appeared in The New York Times and the Washington Post.

At a press conference in Kabul, Karzai was asked about this and said, "Don't listen to the international media regarding news about the Taliban. Don't listen to them. Most of it is propaganda. Don't trust the New York Times. The rest of the media may be fine but don't trust the New York Times."

An Afghan familiar with the reconciliation efforts, speaking confirmed that a delegate claiming to be Mansour "was a fraud." He spoke on condition of anonymity so as not to jeopardize his contacts with both sides.

Karzai denied that anybody named Akhtar Mohammad Mansour was ever brought by NATO to Afghanistan for meetings with him and other officials.

"I did not see Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansour and Mullah Mansour did not come to Afghanistan. Don't accept this news from the foreign press regarding meetings with the elders of the Taliban because most of them are propaganda," Karzai said.

NATO, which was reportedly deeply involved in the meetings and purportedly flew the impostor to Kabul, did not immediately comment on the reports.

Mansour, a former civil aviation minister during Taliban rule, is a senior member of the Taliban's ruling council in the Pakistani city of Quetta. That council, or shura, is run by Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar.

If confirmed, the claims that he was not really involved would be a blow to the Afghan government's push to find a political resolution to the nine-year-old war. It also raised questions about the credibility of some NATO officials who have said they facilitated contacts between Taliban figures and Afghan officials.

According to the reports, the impostor met with Afghan and NATO officials three times -- including once with Karzai -- before they discovered he was not Mansour. He was allegedly paid to attend.

Mansour was a well-known Taliban leader and had a high profile job in the movement's Cabinet. It is not clear why officials would have had such a difficult time identifying him. There are a number of former Taliban in parliament and in the 70-member High Peace Council recently formed by Karzai to find a political solution to the insurgency. It was reported that the man was believed to be a shopkeeper in Quetta.

Although quite senior in the Quetta Shura, Mansour was not promoted to second-in-command of the Quetta shura following last February's arrest in Pakistan of Abdul Ghani Baradar. The Afghan Taliban's No. 2 leader was arrested in a joint raid with the CIA.

Mansour was passed over in favor for Maulvi Zakir Qayyum -- a former Guantanamo detainee. Released into Afghan custody in 2007, Qayyum was freed four months later and rejoined the Taliban.

In Pakistan last week President Barack Obama's special representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke, played down reports about that senior Taliban leaders were holding talks with the Afghan government.


Note:

You can't make this stuff up, folks!  Our troops fighting in Afghanistan for the last TEN YEARS  ... will one day come home and Afghanistan will once again become nothing more than a Taliban-run government, growing poppy and producing heroine for the world ... it will be "business as ususal" for Afghanistan.  

Can we blame Bush for the outcome?  It has worked so well for Obama these past two years ... the "blame" game!

Bee Sting