Monday, April 26, 2010

Update: UN Watch Welcomes News That Judge Goldstone Will Attend Grandson’s Bar Mitzvah”

 UN WATCH



Geneva, April 25, 2010 - UN Watch welcomes the news, as reported by the New York Times, that Richard Goldstone, the South African judge who presided over the controversial UN Human Rights Council report into Israel’s Operation Cast Lead, will attend his grandson’s bar mitzvah 
ceremony at a Johannesburg synagogue next week without facing protests outside the event.

Following earlier reports last week that Judge Goldstone would not attend as a result of threatened protests by some South African Jews, UN Watch contacted the South African Jewish community to convey its concerns. UN Watch, which has numerous readers and supporters in South Africa, expressed the position that any protest surrounding a bar mitzvah ceremony would be inconsistent with basic decency and propriety.

After the story made international news, its main effect was to rally defenders of the one-sided report, who pointed to the controversy as alleged proof that opposition to the document was ad hominem and not substantive.

In an L.A. Times op-ed last week entitled “Attacking Goldstone,” Daniel Terris, director of a Brandeis University ethics center chaired by Goldstone, defended the conclusions of the UN mission, and accused “prominent critics of the report” of making “a quick leap from debate to invective.”

In fact, the most prominent critics of the report have published detailed objections, including the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, philosopher Moshe Halbertal, attorney Trevor Norwitz, Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz and the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. None of these significant documents has been met with any meaningful response.

UN Watch continues to vigorously oppose the report at the UN Human Rights Council, which recently voted to perpetuate the report’s findings and recommendations through the establishment of various committees, and to keep it on the agenda at future sessions.

6 Responses to “UN Watch Welcomes News That Judge Goldstone Will Attend Grandson’s Bar Mitzvah”


  1. 1 lillian pinkus
    i support he work of UN watch, but am disappointed by your stance on Goldstone Goldstone shoud have clearly seen this was a set up for Isreal and shoulkd not have lent his name to this assault since he signed on, and did not insist on balance, he is an enemy of the Jewish people and should be treated as such
  2. 2 Murray Levine
    I agree with UN Watch but if I were Goldstone’s grandson I would simply tell him to find some other bar mitzvah to attend.
  3. 3 James L. Gawron
    Judge Richard Goldstone is the biggest hypocrite on the face of the earth. To pompously attend his grandson’s bar mitzvah while he destroys the State of Israel and slanders Jews world wide is repulsive. Every Jew in the world should carry a Purim noise maker. When ever and where ever you hear Goldstone’s name you must make the noise that you would make for Haman. The Jews at his grandson’s bar mitzvah should make that noise. It is too bad that a 13 year old boy must be embarrassed because of the stupidity of his grandfather but 19 year old Israeli, boys and girls, will be fighting and dying because of Goldstone. Judge Richard Haman Goldstone deserves this treatment and much, much more.
  4. 4 Pierre.Cohen MD
    Bravo decency is on your/our side.
  5. 5 Dr Paul Brown
    UN watch is correct in supporting Goldstone’s return to the family fold. The Jewish way is always to seek to reintegrrate the prodigal son.
    Once, however, the community acknowledged that there are limits. Rather than impose a permanent ban ~ a permanent herem [excommunication] ~ which would anyway play into the hands of anti-Semites, they imposed a temporary ban, as a punishment. Goldstone has yet to be punished appropriately by the Jewish community.
  6. 6 uncle joe mccarthy
    it has been noted that the protest was called off because judge goldstone had agreed to appear at a symposium and face critics of the report
    will un watch be sending a representative?
    will un watch make sure that this time goldstone does not get away without answering direct questions?