Yet another Which-Side-Is-Obama-On moment.
"Unindicted terrorist co-conspirator promotes radical agenda at U.S. mosques," by Aaron Klein at WorldNetDaily, February 19:
A radical Muslim group that was an unindicted co-conspirator in a scheme to raise money for Hamas facilitated the controversial meeting last week between Muslim law students and John Brennan, President Obama's top adviser on counter-terrorism.The Islamic Society of North America, or ISNA, boasted in its website that it facilitated the meeting at New York University with Brennan. ISNA, whose members asked Brennan scores of questions during the event, stated the meeting was intended to initiate a "dialogue between government officials and Muslim American leaders to explore issues of national security."
The Justice Department named ISNA an unindicted co-conspirator in its case against the Holy Land Foundation in Texas, which was found guilty of raising money for the Hamas terrorist organization. Last year, Holy Land founders were given life sentences for "funneling $12 million to Hamas."
ISNA is known for its enforcement of Saudi-style Islam in mosques through the U.S.
Discover the Networks notes ISNA, through its affiliate, the North American Islamic Trust - a Saudi government-backed organization - reportedly holds the mortgages on 50 to 80 percent of all mosques in the U.S. and Canada.
"Thus the organization can freely exercise ultimate authority over these houses of worship and their teachings," states DTN.
ISNA was founded in 1981 by the Saudi-funded Muslim Students' Association. The two groups are still partners. WND previously attended an MSA event at which violence against the U.S. was urged by speakers.
"We are not Americans," shouted one speaker, Muhammad Faheed, at an MSA event attended by WND at Queensborough Community College in 2003.
"We are Muslims. [The U.S.] is going to deport and attack us! It is us versus them! Truth against falsehood! The colonizers and masters against the oppressed, and we will burn down the master's house!"...
Comments on Jihad Watch:
replied to comment from ddoggma | February 20, 2010 6:48 AM | Reply Exactly.
It's insane what's going on with the appeasing and submitting to the Mohammedans.
America is going to hell in a hand basket, people. The Israeli ballerinas can't even perform in VERMONT without being harassed!
http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-3851815,00.html
"Yet another Which-Side-Is-Obama-On moment."
I think he has made that crystal clear...
There is a school of thought that Rasool Obama was recruited by the CIA while he was at Compton College...They needed a 'Muslim' who could talk to the Taliban while they were fighting the Russians...The story go's on, and a Rev Dr Manning, a Christian minister, is going to conduct a trial, Grand Jury style, on May 14th...He says he has documented proof...It would also prove that Rasool is not a US citizen, and never was...If he is right, this is a BIG story...Make up your own mind if you are interested...Scroll down to video...
Thanks for the link to that article. Hell, even ballet is now targeted. There seems to be no end to Muslims behaving badly (and blaming everyone but themselves when they do).
behaving is Un-Islamic
"The Justice Department named ISNA an unindicted co-conspirator..." -- from the article.
I wonder if other phrases besides, or in addition to, "unindicted co-conspirators" would be appropriate to use to link ISNA and CAIR and other Muslim groups to Hamas and Hezbollah. Not only does the "unindicted" part lend itself to providing cover for apologists who would excuse the actions of ISNA and CAIR, but sooner or later Eric Holder is bound to get around to fixing, or at least muddying, even the connection to the Justice Department. There must be other forms of evidence connecting them to officially designated terrorist groups, including real indictments, perhaps a few deportations or refusals to grant visas, that could be cited as well to reinforce the point that there is a consistent pattern of illegal behavior involved. To those like me without trained legal ears, and who might not otherwise be familiar with the background and history of these groups, "unindicted" hints at accusation without proof. I note that CAIR and ISNA don't refute the charges, but to the wider public who is listening and might still be confused by the issue it might be useful from time to time to mention these other forms of evidence.
OT...Drudge has an article about the Dutch government falling...The article says that Geert Wilders Freedom party may be the winner in the next election...Question...How does this effect Geerts trial? A lot, or not at all?
replied to comment from duh_swami | February 20, 2010 10:48 AM | Reply Thanks for the heads up about the Drudge story on the fall of the Dutch government http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100220/ts_nm/us_dutch_government_afghanistan_1 . Good question about how it could affect Wilers' trial. One could see how it could go either way. It could help him by putting him on a fast track toward becoming the next prime minister, but on the other hand it could motivate his opponents to redouble their efforts to obtain a "conviction" so as to eliminate him from politics altogether.
ISNA is known for its enforcement of Saudi-style Islam in mosques through the U.S.
Discover the Networks notes ISNA, through its affiliate, the North American Islamic Trust - a Saudi government-backed organization - reportedly holds the mortgages on 50 to 80 percent of all mosques in the U.S. and Canada.
"Thus the organization can freely exercise ultimate authority over these houses of worship and their teachings," states DTN.
........................
Another reason it's so difficult to find "moderate Muslims". The mosque system virtually ensures that they will mostly be staffed by those who take their Islam straight up—Saudi style—so to speak.
In addition, a great deal of literature for U.S. mosques is supplied by the Wahabbis, as well.
more:
"We are not Americans," shouted one speaker, Muhammad Faheed, at an MSA event attended by WND at Queensborough Community College in 2003.
"We are Muslims. [The U.S.] is going to deport and attack us! It is us versus them! Truth against falsehood! The colonizers and masters against the oppressed, and we will burn down the master's house!"...
........................
The insanity of this rhetoric should be obvious. For one thing, it is curious that Faheed refers to Americans as "colonizers", when it is he and his fellow Muslim students who came to the U.S., to take advantage of our economic opportunities and system of higher education.
More Muslim projection...
"I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." From "Audacity of Hope." - B Hussein Obama