FamilySecurityMatters.com
and
http://www.examiner.com/x-5740-San-Jose-Republican-Examiner~y2010m2d20-The-erosion-of-free-speech
CPAC is certainly kicking off in high gear. On the menu this year? Islam and Free Speech, a session inviting more than a few whiners from CAIR.
An upcoming panel relating to jihad has spokesthug Ibrahim 'Doug' Hooper's panties twisted into a wad. It's been a rough year for CAIR; the publication of 'Muslim Mafia;' their flurry of lawsuits and frustrated PR wave in an effort to squash what they're referring to as 'the 'outrageous lies spread about the religion of peace!' big smile. note: the lawsuits have been unsuccessful. They are baseless.
It's only going to get worse for these folks as Americans nationwide have been alerted to jihad, dualism, roots of terror, including comparisons between the Nazis and modern radicals http://http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=20831 The boys in the Mo's Brotherhood probably thought much of the 'efforts' to educate America would die down once they 'rid themselves' of Stephen Coughlin from his position at the Pentagon for being too 'strong' in his opinions against radical Islam. (I hate that Coughlin was fired but the idea that the pro-Islam dolts within the system thought that somehow this might make him 'less' potent truly makes me smile)
You guessed it. Coughlin is the featured presenter for the jihad event at CPAC this year. I'm thrilled and joining him will be; Lt. Colonel Allen West, War Hero and Candidate for Congress,Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, Austria, Activist, Anders Gravers, Danish Leader, SIOE, Simon Deng, Ex-Slave, Sudan, Human Rights Activist.
I can only imagine that Hooper and his fellow mosque dwellers are wondering how this could have happened and see this as ultimate betrayal.
Coughlin's message must be heard. He warns of the threat, the western penetration of Islam that sounds far-fetched to most Americans and when writing about it, invokes cries of 'fear-mongering' or 'inciting hatred' or 'writing offensive material' (that last one applies to one of my articles recently) This is not uncommon and often the result of pressure from the 'offended' community who engages in dualism; a passive-aggressive slow-growing societal cancer that is difficult to put one's finger on unless you're trained to 'see' it or truly understand the underlying elements and can clip them quickly and efficiently, each time they're encountered in everyday life.
As it is, Townhall published my article and it ended up with far more exposure then it would have had it not 'offended' individuals. (what first amendment?)
It's critical to press on, as without people willing to stomach the criticism of others, jihad prevails. Geert Wilders is on trial for his life for refusing to stay silent. He's been desperate to warn America that it's time to stop with the concerns of political correctness, especially when the muslims of Europe are throwing around ridiculous terms such as Islamophobia' although there is no such thing. It's a similar principle to theft. If you 'knew' someone was going to steal from you eventually, you'd watch your wallet around them or avoid them altogether, right? Would that make you 'greedy?' no. Islam calls for the destruction of infidels. The definition of 'infidel' is Jew or Christian. Therefore, avoiding muslims, being distrustful of them, even the 'nice' ones is not islamaphobia.
it's called rational thought.
