Showing posts with label Holocaust Remembrance Day. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Holocaust Remembrance Day. Show all posts

Monday, February 1, 2010

The Crime of Remembering the Holocaust


There has for a while now been building a steady chorus of protest over commemorating the Holocaust. The voices are both Jewish and Non-Jewish. Some of them come from the left which indicts the Holocaust for being too limited to Jews to be worth remembering and as a pretext for oppressing the poor paleo-terrorist people. Some come from the right which claims the whole thing is anti-Christian and just prevents reconciliation between the Jews and everyone else.

Too much, the voices cry. Too much remembrance. Too much dedicated to remembering it. Who needs it anyway.

David Klinghoffer sums up this view quite nicely when he writes, "Our preoccupation with the ultimate symbol of anti-Semitism, the Holocaust, has become notorious. There is no end in sight to the Holocaust history books, Holocaust novels, Holocaust television shows, Holocaust magazine and newspaper articles, chairs in Holocaust studies at universities, Holocaust museums, Holocaust poems, Holocaust paintings, Holocaust sculptures..."

Remembering the Holocaust is then a preoccupation. Some annoying obsession we can't seem to let go of. These same voices do not seem to think that the Civil War is a notorious preoccupation though it happened nearly a century and a half ago, though there are Civil War memorials, Civil War television shows, Civil War movies, Civil War books, Civil War newspaper articles, Civil War paintings, Civil War studies, Civil War poems.

Folks like Klinghoffer do not pen articles asking Americans to give up their preoccupation with the Civil War, to cry a halt, enough is enough. They feel no irritation at it in the least. For that matter Klinghoffer is not bothered by WW2 memorials, television shows, movies, books, magazine articles, studies and poems. It's perfectly okay to be 'preoccupied' with WW2, just not with the Jewish end of it. The moment studying WW2 slips into studying what happened to the Jews in WW2, it instantly becomes to him an example of neurotic behavior. An obsession with anti-Semitism. An unhealthy fixation on the murder of six million Jews.

When the Jews of Europe first went out of the world, the Holocaust was not a safe subject for discussion, nor was had happened to them. The allies who issued statements condemning German atrocities in leaflets dropped over Germany, did not mention the Jews. Neither did Roosevelt in his radio addresses. Neither did the Pope. The Jews who were liberated from the concentration camps (now the subject of many glowing documentaries) were not set free, for the most part they were considered DP's, Displaced Persons, and were put right back into camps with barbed wire, guarded by armed German guards. There was little if any recognition that anything particular had happened to them.

The Jews were considered citizens of their countries of origin meant to be returned there, never mind the fact that the citizens of most of those countries had willingly played a part in butchering them and that many of those countries were now under Stalinist rule. Truman fumed over a handful of Jewish refugees admitted to the United States. Eisenhower fumed over the Jews in the DP camps who refused to do what they were told. The State Department in partnership with the British fumed that despite their best hopes, some Jews had survived the Holocaust after all and were headed on illegal boats to British ruled Israel.

After the Holocaust there was no flood of memoirs. There was little in the way of a uniquely Jewish historical understanding of what had gone on. The academic, political and press consensus was that the Nazis had been mean people who had killed a lot of people, for no particular reason, except that they were against democracy. An echo of that kind of silly stupid rhetoric can still be heard in Bush's speeches when he presumes that Democracy equates with morality and a lack of it with amorality. That is belied by the fact that in WW2 fascist regimes and Fascist nations like Mussolini, Tojo and Franco did more to save Jews than democratic Switzerland or democratic France did, when they handed over Jews to the Nazis to be shot.

Most of the Nazis who had been convicted of war crimes were prematurely released under pressure frin the German government. Former Nazis had no trouble finding plenty of countries to take them in from Argentina to Ireland to America, which brought in many of them to 'fight Communism.' Post-WW2 discussions of atrocities were far more likely to focus on Hiroshima and Dresden than on Auschwitz and Dachau.

In the Senate, Senator Joseph McCarthy, who before hijacking and wrecking a legitimate investigation into Communist infiltration of America, had stood on the Senate floor thundering demands that the SS perpetrators of the Malmedy Massacre of 84 US troops be freed because their confessions had been obtained under duress (shades of Gitmo). The SS men who had murdered American soldiers were eventually all released in a matter of years. As were most of those who had been responsible for the Holocaust. On the Holocaust itself there was a shameful silence.

The USSR denied any Holocaust of Jews had taken place. Even decades later when it granted that it had, it limited the number to 3 million, those Jews who had been living in Soviet territories. The rest didn't matter. Many of those refugees had made it out of German territory into the USSR had been shot as German spies. Behind the scenes Stalin was hatching a plan for a Soviet Holocaust of the Jews. One that would permit the USSR to carry off a Holocaust while still keep Communists and socialist around the world loyal to the Soviet Union, using plausible deniability. Up until this point Communism had managed to murder hundreds of thousands of Jews, imprison many more and suppress Jewish culture and religion, while still being claimed by liberal Jews and non-Jews around the world, from Time Magazine to H.G. Wells to the Archbishop of Canterbury. There was no reason, Stalin thought, he couldn't wipe out all the Jews and still remain the world's beloved, Uncle Joe.

The Allies were meanwhile too busy embracing our newfound German allies against Communism to want to hear anything about their crimes. The newly hatched Israeli government was all too willing to sweep the whole thing under the rug in order to build ties with Germany. When future Prime Minister Begin led a march of Holocaust survivors in protest to the Knesset against the German policies of the Labor Socialist government, they were tear gassed by the police. I could tell far worse stories but I will not. No one wanted to hear from those had survived the Holocaust.

Today they are dying and we are hearing from them. We are remembering and listening, for what little good it does and still there are still many voices raised in protest that would prefer we didn't. Voices from the right and the left, voices of conservative and liberal Jews. Rabbi Daniel Lapin is outraged that the Holocaust Museum linked Christian anti-Semitism to the Holocaust, as if Germany and Eastern Europe in the first half of the 20th century had been populated entirely by Hindus. David Klinghoffer of course finds all the Holocaust talk to be a bit too much.

But we remember. Many thousands of years later we pray at the gravesite of Rachel our mother. Thousands of years later we weep at the remnant wall of the temple. We stand at Masada and each ten day interval between Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur we recite piyutim remembering those murdered in the Crusades. We have not forgotten and we will not forget. To the 'Jewish' Klinghoffers of the right and the left, sneering at us, we can only reply to them as we do at the Seder, that is it a matter of Lachem Ve'Lo Lo. It is to us that this matter not to you. It is to us who are a part of it, who feel it in our hearts and our souls. You have no part of it or a part in us. As Naomi said to Orpah, go home. Our home is with the Jewish people, the living and the dead. Yours is elsewhere. Go and find it wherever it may be.
From NY to Jerusalem, Daniel Greenfield Covers the Stories Behind the News

Named one of the Jewish Press' Most Worthwhile Blogs, 2006, 2007 , 2008 and 2009

Cited at Front Page Magazine , Melanie Philips and One Jerusalem, Outpost and Little Green Footballs and American Thinker and Hot Air

Quoted by
Daniel Pipes , Andrew Bostom, Atlas Shrugs, Debbie Schlussel and Tim Blair, Judith Klinghoffer and Michelle Malkin

Radio mentions by Michael Savage , Quinn and Rose, "America's Morning Show" ,AM 770 CHQR - The World Tonight with Rob Breakenridge , 680 WCBM Sean and Frank and Jim Ball


Thursday, January 28, 2010

UN General Assembly unanimously designates January 27 as Holocaust Remembrance Day

1 Nov 2005

The United Nations General Assembly unanimously adopted a resolution introduced by Israel and designated January 27 as Holocaust Remembrance Day.
The United Nations General Assembly today (Tuesday, 1 November 2005) unanimously adopted a resolution introduced by Israel and designated January 27 as Holocaust Remembrance Day. In doing so, the assembly urged the nations of the world to observe the day so that future generations will be spared acts of genocide.

Co-sponsored by 104 other states, the resolution rejects Holocaust denial and encourages countries to develop educational programs about the horrors of genocide. It also condemns religious intolerance, incitement, harassment, or violence based on ethnic origin or religious belief.

Assembly President Jan Eliasson said the memory of the Holocaust must be "a unifying historic warning around which we must rally; not only to recall the grievous crimes committed in human history, but also to reaffirm our unfaltering resolve to prevent the recurrence of such crimes."

Israeli Ambassador Dan Gillerman said the Holocaust "brought us face to face with the full extent of man's capacity for inhumanity to his fellow man," and that it served as a "critical impetus" for the development of human rights, the drafting of landmark international conventions on genocide, and the founding of the UN itself.



Resolution adopted by the General Assembly
[without reference to a Main Committee (A/60/L.12 and Add.1)]
60/7 Holocaust remembrance

The General Assembly,

Reaffirming the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,1 which proclaims that everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth therein, without distinction of any kind, such as race, religion or other status,

Recalling article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states that everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person,

Recalling also article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,2 which state that everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion,

Bearing in mind that the founding principle of the Charter of the United Nations, “to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war”, is testimony to the indelible link between the United Nations and the unique tragedy of the Second World War,

Recalling the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide,3 which was adopted in order to avoid repetition of genocides such as those committed by the Nazi regime,

Recalling also the preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states that disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind,

Taking note of the fact that the sixtieth session of the General Assembly is taking place during the sixtieth year of the defeat of the Nazi regime,

Recalling the twenty-eighth special session of the General Assembly, a unique event, held in commemoration of the sixtieth anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi concentration camps,

Honouring the courage and dedication shown by the soldiers who liberated the concentration camps,

Reaffirming that the Holocaust, which resulted in the murder of one third of the Jewish people, along with countless members of other minorities, will forever be a warning to all people of the dangers of hatred, bigotry, racism and prejudice,

1. Resolves that the United Nations will designate 27 January as an annual International Day of Commemoration in memory of the victims of the Holocaust;

2. Urges Member States to develop educational programmes that will inculcate future generations with the lessons of the Holocaust in order to help to prevent future acts of genocide, and in this context commends the Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research;

3. Rejects any denial of the Holocaust as an historical event, either in full or part;

4. Commends those States which have actively engaged in preserving those sites that served as Nazi death camps, concentration camps, forced labour camps and prisons during the Holocaust;

5. Condemns without reserve all manifestations of religious intolerance, incitement, harassment or violence against persons or communities based on ethnic origin or religious belief, wherever they occur;

6. Requests the Secretary-General to establish a programme of outreach on the subject of the “Holocaust and the United Nations” as well as measures to mobilize civil society for Holocaust remembrance and education, in order to help to prevent future acts of genocide; to report to the General Assembly on the
establishment of this programme within six months from the date of the adoption of the present resolution; and to report thereafter on the implementation of the programme at its sixty-third session.

42nd plenary meeting
1 November 2005

__________________
1 Resolution 217 A (III).
2 See resolution 2200 A (XXI), annex.
3 Resolution 260 A (III), annex.
A/RES/60/72

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Turkey: Holocaust is most grave crime against humanity in history

Haartz.com
January 26, 2010
The Turkish Foreign Ministry marked International Holocaust Remembrance Day on Tuesday with a statement in which it condemned the Holocaust and vowed to prevent anti-Semitism, racism, xenophobia and discrimination.

Sources in the Israeli Foreign Ministry say that the Turkish statement was exceptional compared to statements of recent years. "Condemning the Holocaust as the most grave and unprecedented crime against humanity throughout history, taking necessary precautions to prevent genocides in the future and promoting the endeavors to educate new generations are not only a duty of every member state of the UN, but also an obligation to humanity," the Turkish statement read.

"Stemming from its belief in mutual understanding, tolerance, freedom, security and democracy, Turkey is resolute to continue its stance to prevent anti-Semitism, racism, xenophobia and discrimination."

The Turkish statement also commended Turkish diplomats who risked their lives during the Second World War to save people from the Nazis.

The Turkish statement did not refer specifically to Israel or Jews as victims of the Holocaust.

A few days ago, the Israeli Foreign Ministry released a seven-page report to the "septet" of key cabinet ministers in which Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan was charged with indirectly inciting and encouraging anti-Semitism.

According to the report, Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon's humiliation of the Turkish ambassador earlier this month seriously offended Turkey, but also made it clear to Ankara that it had crossed red lines in its relationship with Israel.

The report was written by the Center for Political Research, which performs the ministry's in-house intelligence analysis, and has already been distributed to Israeli embassies and consulates abroad.

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman and Ayalon, both of Yisrael Beiteinu, are the leaders of the government's aggressive anti-Turkey faction, while Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Industry Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer, both of Labor, head the conciliatory, pro-Turkey faction.