Monday, December 06, 2010
ATLAS SHRUGS - PAMELA GELLER
What is most interesting about the WikiLeaks is that it validates everything I have been covering at Atlas for years. Everything. Obama's pro-jihahist leanings and antisemitic/anti-Israel predilections, the Islamization of Turkey, Iran and its proxies Hezb'Allah and Hamas, the global warming hoax, and on and on.
Obama's jihad is thriving, it seems, and not just in his translated book title to the Muslim world -- "Obama's Jihad: Jakarta to the Whitehouse."
Obama's tacit support of jihadist forces worldwide is yet another impeachable offense. The man was elected to support and defend the Constitution -- not to mention the American people. Aiding in America's downfall cannot be sanctioned or ignored.
Those who thought that Obama's inviting the Muslim Brotherhood to his speech in Cairo was mere window dressing are engaging in dangerous self-delusion. It was the tip of the iceberg. Seth Mandel details the ugly behind-the-scenes collusion in this American Thinker piece.
Forgive the Mandel's use of "Islamist" in the headline. It's a silly term, IMAO.
WikiLeaks Exposes White House's Conscious Support of Islamists American Thinker
The fact that the latest installment of WikiLeaks coincided with the Egyptian parliamentary elections is unfortunate timing for the U.S. It provides an unflattering portrait of a White House that sides with Islamists both in and out of power around the world.
Though it was to be expected -- in the spirit of "free and fair" elections -- that the White House would say it was "disappointed" that Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak shut out the Muslim Brotherhood from the electoral process, how will President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton explain their purposeful strengthening of ties with other Islamists who fund terrorism and undermine U.S. policy in the Middle East and Southeast Asia?
Take, for example, the Obama administration's infusion of goodwill into our relationship with Turkey. Here is how EurasiaNetreportedSecretary Clinton's visit to Turkey early on in the administration:
Combining statecraft with stagecraft, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appears to have turned around US-Turkish relations. For most of the Bush administration's tenure, Washington had a strained relationship with Ankara, but Clinton's first visit to Turkey as President Barack Obama's secretary of state has Turkish officials feeling more optimistic about the future of bilateral relations.Obama followed up a month later in an address to the Turkish parliament that local media called"historic." In that speech, Obama called for Turkey's accession to the EU.Let me be clear: the United States strongly supports Turkey's bid to become a member of the European Union," the president said, adding that "Turkish membership would broaden and strengthen Europe's foundation once more.
And more recently, Turkey was publicly assured that the White House would oppose any resolution recognizing the Armenian genocide. The administration continued to reaffirm the friendship between the two countries even in the face of Turkey's involvement in the terror flotillaand the country's blocking of increased sanctions on Iran.
All along, the administration could attribute these actions to the pitfalls of multilateral diplomacy and not a deliberate ideological pursuit on the part of Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to usher in a new age of Islamist regional power. Until now.
Thanks to WikiLeaks, we now know that American diplomats were well aware of the direction Erdo ğ an intended to take his country. GlobalPost quotes one leaked cable offering a pretty clear assessment: "Does all this mean that the country is becoming more focused on the Islamist world and its Muslim tradition in its foreign policy? Absolutely."
"Shrugging off diplomatic-speak, American diplomats describe Turkish Prime Minister Teyyip Erdogan as an outspoken Islamist and 'perfectionist workaholic' who may be seeking the creation of an Islamic state," GlobalPost's Iason Athanasiadis reports.
And what of Turkey's claims that part of its value to the West lies in its ability to act as a productive intermediary between the U.S. and Iran? Nonsense, as American diplomats found out. Athanasiadis once more:Reports allege that, contrary to their claims, Turkish politicians cannot [e]ffect changes in Iranian attitudes and that their country is being used as a transit zone to smuggle dual-use materials into Iran for its controversial nuclear program.It would be one thing if our support for the Turkish Islamists were only verbal. But that's not the case. We are prepared tosellthe Turks the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. According to Michael Rubin, this decision was made "without even reviewing the potential for technology transfer." He added that Obama was also considering putting an early-warning missile radar -- intended mainly as protection from Iranian missiles -- in Turkey.
And Erdo ğan is not an isolated case. His network of Islamists includes Malaysia's Anwar Ibrahim, former deputy prime ministerand current leader of the opposition. Ibrahim is currently on trial for what his supporters say are trumped-up charges of sodomy, and his powerful friends in the U.S., such as Al Gore and Paul Wolfowitz, have stridently defended him as a persecuted moderate Muslim who should serve as an example of the kind of Islam the U.S. has been -- and should be -- promoting. Hillary Clinton, in her role as secretary of state, requested a face-to-face meeting with Anwar last month, and when it didn't happen, she pressed the Malaysian leadership privately and publiclyon Anwar's behalf.
But Anwar is also an anti-Semite, complaining of Zionist infiltration of state agencies and Israeli proxy control of police units. And Anwar is a co-founder of the International Institute of Islamic Thought, a Muslim Brotherhood think-tank in Virginia that has called for violence against Israel and has been under investigation by the FBI for the better part of a decade for its ties to terrorist organizations.
There's more. Read it all.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Monday, December 06, 2010 at 12:51 PM in Infiltration
SOURCE: ATLAS SHRUGS
Comment on Atlas Shrugs:
Davod said...
I know you have covered Kenya well. But it doesn't hurt to remind your readers that Obama was in Kenya as a senator supporting his Sharia supporting relative and the US spent 22 million supporting the referendum on the Kenyan constitution. Changes which enshrined Sharia into the constitution.
Richard 2 said...
Obama is a traitor to the US and to civilization, but we will never be able to impeach him, we will never get enough Democrats in the Senate to vote for removing him from office. The best we can pray for is that he is arrested and tried after he leaves office, but since Clinton wasn't I doubt he will be.
MY NOTE:
I NORMALLY DO NOT POST COMMENTS FROM SOMEONE ELSE'S BLOG. HOWEVER, I AM MAKING AN EXCEPTION TO THAT RULE TONIGHT IN ORDER TO DEMONSTRATE THAT AMERICANS ARE FED UP WITH THE MUSLIM FROM KENYA, SITTING IN OUR WHITE HOUSE, AND HOPING ONE PERSON IN THE U.S. HOUSE AND/OR CONGRESS WILL STEP UP AND BEGIN PROCEEDINGS TO IMPEACH THE TRAITOR TO THE U.S.
IT NEEDS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BEFORE AMERICA LOOKS MORE LIKE ONE OF OBAMA'S FAVORITE COUNTRIES IN SOUTH AMERICA OR THE MIDDLE EAST OF ARABIA!BEE STING
PS: Posted on Atlas Shrugs Saturday, August 16, 2008
PS: Posted on Atlas Shrugs Saturday, August 16, 2008
OBAMA'S JIHAD: JAKARTA TO THE WHITEHOUSE
How many Americans know that when Obama had his bloviating screed "The Audacity of Hope" was translated into Indonesian - the title went from "The Audacity of Hope" to "Jihad: From Jakarta To The Whitehouse". The man is dishonest about his Islamic leanings. Check thisour from An American expat Living in Indonesia:
When I first saw the recently released Indonesian translation of Barack Obama's book "The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming The American Dream", over here in Southeast Asia I was completely taken aback not only by the violent imagery in new title of the book, "Menerjang Harapan: Dari Jakarta Menuju Gedung Putih", but by the fact that it was not really a translation at all, but rather a completely different title than the original book.A correct translation of the title of Obama's book would have been "Keberanian Harapan: Pemikiran Untuk Meraih Kembali Impian America" which translates into "Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming The American Dream". However, the title for the Indonesian translation of Barack Obama's book is "Menerjang Harapan: Dari Jakarta Menuju Gedung Putih" which translates into "Assault Hope: From Jakarta to the WhiteHouse".
[...]Why would the publishers drastically change the title of the book for the Indonesian translation and make use of such figurative language? Your guess is as good as mine, but it would seem that Barack Obama is quite interested with promoting himself in Southeast Asia as a crusader for the cause of Indonesia's Muslims.
Read it all .......most disturbing.
Posted by Pamela Geller on Saturday, August 16, 2008 at 04:11 AM in Muslim in the White House?, WHITE HOUSE: THE RACE TO NOVEMBER
